Complex Grief Represents a Profound and Enduring Disruption of the Natural Grieving Process, Distinguished by Persistent Distress, Functional Impairment, and Emotional Suffering
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- Understanding Complex Grief
- Factors Influencing the Development of Complex Grief
- Symptoms and Manifestations
- Treatment Approaches
- Diagnosis and Assessment
- Impact on Mental Health and Functioning
- Cultural and Social Considerations
- Conclusion
- References
- Report Compiler
- Disclaimer
"Complex grief, also known as Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD), represents a significant disruption of the normal bereavement process. Unlike typical grief that diminishes over time, complex grief persists, leading to profound emotional pain, impaired daily functioning, and increased risk for physical and mental health disorders. Formally recognized in the DSM-5-TR, complex grief is characterized by intense yearning for the deceased, difficulty accepting the loss, and chronic distress lasting beyond culturally expected timeframes.
Risk factors include sudden or violent losses, close relational ties, pre-existing mental health conditions, and lack of social support. Diagnosis relies on structured clinical interviews and standardized tools such as the PG-13 and the Inventory of Complicated Grief. Treatment primarily involves psychotherapeutic interventions like Complicated Grief Therapy (CGT), Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and community support programs. Pharmacological treatments are typically reserved for co-occurring conditions like depression.
Cultural sensitivity is critical in assessment and intervention, as mourning expressions vary widely across societies. Recent research highlights neurobiological underpinnings of complex grief and explores innovative treatments, including digital therapy platforms and psychedelic-assisted therapy. Without intervention, complex grief can lead to serious health consequences, emphasizing the need for early identification, compassionate care, and broader public awareness.
Addressing complex grief is essential for fostering recovery, rebuilding meaningful lives, and honoring the diverse ways humans experience and process profound loss.
The Psychological Effects of War
2. Introduction
Grief is a natural response to loss, characterized by emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and physical reactions (Worden, 2018). However, for some individuals, grief may become prolonged and debilitating, evolving into what is now termed complex grief or prolonged grief disorder (PGD). Unlike normative grief, complex grief significantly impairs social, occupational, and personal functioning over an extended period (Prigerson et al., 2009). Recognized formally in the DSM-5-TR under "Prolonged Grief Disorder" (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022), complex grief demands clinical attention distinct from depression or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This paper explores complex grief and bereavement, covering risk factors, symptomatology, diagnosis, treatment, cultural considerations, and future directions.
3. Understanding Complex Grief
Complex grief, also referred to as complicated grief or PGD, occurs when the natural process of mourning is derailed, leading to persistent and intense emotional pain (Shear, 2015). It is characterized by yearning, preoccupation with the deceased, difficulty moving on, and significant impairment in daily functioning beyond culturally expected timeframes (APA, 2022).
In contrast to normal bereavement, where grief reactions gradually decrease in intensity, complex grief maintains or exacerbates distress over months or years (Boelen et al., 2016). This maladaptive response may prevent individuals from adapting to life without the deceased, creating a chronic state of suffering.
4. Factors Influencing the Development of Complex Grief
- Nature of the Loss
Sudden, unexpected, or violent deaths (such as those resulting from accidents, suicides, or homicides) are strongly correlated with complex grief (Kristensen et al., 2012). The shock and trauma of these losses hinder emotional processing, leaving survivors vulnerable to pathological mourning.
- Relationship to the Deceased
Losses involving close kinship—such as a child, spouse, or parent—are more likely to result in complex grief (Stroebe et al., 2007). High dependency relationships, whether emotional, physical, or financial, intensify the bereavement response.
- Pre-Existing Mental Health Conditions
Individuals with prior histories of mood disorders, anxiety, PTSD, or insecure attachment styles are at elevated risk for complex grief (Simon, 2013). Personality traits, such as neuroticism or poor emotion regulation abilities, further exacerbate vulnerability.
- Lack of Social Support
A perceived or real deficiency in emotional support from friends, family, or community significantly increases the risk of prolonged grief (Lannen et al., 2008). Isolation inhibits the normal processing of grief and magnifies feelings of despair.
5. Symptoms and Manifestations
Complex grief presents with a constellation of symptoms that overlap with but are distinct from depression and PTSD.
Emotional Symptoms
-
Intense longing or yearning for the deceased.
-
Persistent sorrow, bitterness, or anger related to the loss.
-
Difficulty experiencing positive emotions (Shear, 2015).
Cognitive Symptoms
-
Preoccupation with thoughts of the deceased.
-
Rumination about the circumstances of death.
-
Feelings of emptiness and meaninglessness (Prigerson et al., 2009).
Behavioral Symptoms
-
Avoidance of reminders of the deceased.
-
Compulsive seeking of proximity to reminders or memorabilia.
-
Social withdrawal and neglect of personal responsibilities.
Physical Symptoms
-
Sleep disturbances.
-
Fatigue and somatic complaints such as headaches or gastrointestinal issues (Boelen & Smid, 2017).
Unlike acute grief, where symptoms typically diminish, complex grief symptoms persist and impair functioning over a minimum of 12 months, according to DSM-5-TR guidelines (APA, 2022).
6. Diagnosis and Assessment
Complex grief is now formally recognized with diagnostic criteria outlined in DSM-5-TR (APA, 2022) and the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) (World Health Organization, 2019).
Diagnostic Criteria Include:
-
Bereavement lasting beyond 12 months (6 months for children).
-
Intense yearning or preoccupation with the deceased.
-
Significant distress and impairment in daily life.
-
Symptoms are not better explained by depression, PTSD, or another mental disorder.
Several standardized tools aid diagnosis:
-
Prolonged Grief Disorder-13 (PG-13) (Prigerson et al., 2009).
-
Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) (Prigerson & Jacobs, 2001).
-
Traumatic Grief Inventory (TGI-SR) (Boelen & Smid, 2017).
Despite these tools, challenges remain in differentiating complex grief from culturally normative mourning, major depressive disorder, or PTSD.
7. Treatment Approaches
Early identification and appropriate treatment significantly improve outcomes for those suffering from complex grief.
Psychotherapeutic Interventions
- Complicated Grief Therapy (CGT)
Developed by Shear and colleagues, CGT is a structured, 16-session treatment integrating elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (Shear et al., 2005). It focuses on processing grief, rebuilding relationships, and restoring meaning.
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
CBT for grief focuses on restructuring maladaptive thoughts about the loss, promoting adaptive coping skills, and addressing avoidance behaviors (Boelen et al., 2006).
- Narrative Therapy
Narrative approaches encourage individuals to reconstruct the story of their relationship with the deceased and the loss itself, promoting meaning-making and emotional integration (Neimeyer, 2016).
- Pharmacological Treatment
While no medications are specifically approved for complex grief, antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be prescribed to address comorbid depression or anxiety symptoms (Zisook & Shear, 2009). Pharmacotherapy is generally adjunctive to psychotherapy.
- Support Groups and Community Resources
Peer-led or professionally facilitated support groups provide emotional validation, social support, and communal healing opportunities. Grief-specific community services enhance coping, particularly for those with limited informal support networks (Wetherell, 2012).
Impact on Mental Health and Functioning
Left untreated, complex grief can lead to profound psychological and physical consequences.
Mental Health Comorbidities:
-
Major depressive disorder.
-
PTSD.
-
Substance use disorders (Simon, 2013).
Physical Health Risks:
-
Cardiovascular disease.
-
Impaired immune functioning (Buckley et al., 2012).
Impaired Functioning:
-
Persistent absenteeism from work or school.
-
Relationship breakdowns.
-
Reduced engagement in meaningful activities.
The chronic activation of stress responses due to unresolved grief can significantly reduce life expectancy (Stroebe et al., 2007).
8. Cultural and Social Considerations
Grief manifestations and expectations differ widely across cultures (Rosenblatt, 2008). Understanding these differences is essential for sensitive diagnosis and intervention.
In some cultures, expressions of continuing bonds with the deceased (e.g., ancestor worship) are normative, whereas in others, detachment and moving forward are emphasized (Rosenblatt, 2008). Thus, cultural norms shape whether grief symptoms are viewed as pathological.
Culturally sensitive therapy involves:
-
Exploring the client’s cultural background and mourning rituals.
-
Validating culturally specific grief expressions.
-
Incorporating culturally meaningful healing practices into treatment (Gone, 2010).
Ignoring cultural context risks misdiagnosing normal cultural expressions of grief as complex grief.
9. Current Research and Future Directions
Recent research has illuminated several promising areas in complex grief treatment and understanding:
- Neuroscientific Findings:
Brain imaging studies show that individuals with complex grief exhibit heightened activity in reward-related regions (such as the nucleus accumbens) when exposed to reminders of the deceased (O'Connor et al., 2008). This finding supports the idea that yearning in complex grief has an addictive-like neurobiological basis.
- Digital Interventions:
Online grief therapies and virtual support groups are emerging as accessible alternatives for those unable or unwilling to attend in-person therapy (Eisma et al., 2020).
- Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy:
Preliminary research suggests that psychedelic-assisted therapy (e.g., with psilocybin) may facilitate emotional processing and acceptance of loss in individuals with complicated grief (Griffiths et al., 2016).
- Policy Initiatives:
Advocacy for formal recognition of complex grief in diagnostic manuals promotes broader access to care, insurance coverage, and destigmatization.
Future research must focus on refining diagnostic criteria, developing culturally adaptable interventions, and integrating technological advancements to reach broader populations.
10. Conclusion
Complex grief represents a profound and enduring disruption of the natural grieving process, distinguished by persistent distress, functional impairment, and emotional suffering. Risk factors include the nature of the loss, the relationship to the deceased, personal mental health history, and available social support. Diagnosis, while challenging, is aided by standardized instruments, and treatment typically involves a combination of psychotherapy, pharmacological support, and community engagement." (Source: ChatGPT 2025)
Cultural sensitivity remains paramount, as grief is deeply intertwined with societal and spiritual beliefs. Emerging neuroscience and digital therapies offer promising avenues for improving outcomes. Addressing complex grief effectively requires compassionate, individualized care that honors both the universality and diversity of human mourning.
Mental Health Status During Russia-Ukraine War
11. References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR).
Boelen, P. A., de Keijser, J., van den Hout, M. A., & van den Bout, J. (2006). Treatment of complicated grief: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 940–949.
Boelen, P. A., & Smid, G. E. (2017). The traumatic grief inventory self-report version. Death Studies, 41(9), 512–527.
Buckley, T., McKinley, S., Tofler, G., & Bartrop, R. (2012). Cardiovascular risk in bereavement: A review of the literature. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 55(4), 327–333.
Eisma, M. C., Boelen, P. A., & Lenferink, L. I. M. (2020). Prolonged grief disorder following the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 288, 113031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113031
Gone, J. P. (2010). Psychotherapy and traditional healing for American Indians: Exploring the prospects for therapeutic integration. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(2), 166–235.
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Carducci, M. A., et al. (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12), 1181–1197.
Kristensen, P., Weisæth, L., & Heir, T. (2012). Bereavement and mental health after sudden and violent losses: A review. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 75(1), 76–97.
Lannen, P. K., Wolfe, J., Prigerson, H. G., Onelov, E., & Kreicbergs, U. C. (2008). Unresolved grief in a national sample of bereaved parents: Impaired mental and physical health 4 to 9 years later. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(36), 5870–5876.
Neimeyer, R. A. (2016). Techniques of grief therapy: Creative practices for counseling the bereaved. Routledge.
O'Connor, M. F., Wellisch, D. K., Stanton, A. L., Eisenberger, N. I., & Irwin, M. R. (2008). Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain's reward center. NeuroImage, 42(2), 969–972.
Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., et al. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121.
Prigerson, H. G., & Jacobs, S. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 613–645). American Psychological Association.
Rosenblatt, P. C. (2008). Grief across cultures: A review and research agenda. Routledge.
Shear, M. K. (2015). Complicated grief. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(2), 153–160.
Shear, M. K., Frank, E., Houck, P. R., & Reynolds III, C. F. (2005). Treatment of complicated grief: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 293(21), 2601–2608.
Simon, N. M. (2013). Treating complicated grief. JAMA, 310(4), 416–423.
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 370(9603), 1960–1973.
Wetherell, J. L. (2012). Complicated grief therapy as a new treatment approach. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(2), 159–166.
World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision) (ICD-11).
Zisook, S., & Shear, K. (2009). Grief and bereavement: What psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 67–74.
13. Disclaimer
This 'Complex Grief and Bereavement' report is based on information available at the time of its preparation and is provided for informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and completeness, errors and omissions may occur. The compiler of the Complex Grief and Bereavement (ChatGPT) and / or Vernon Chalmers for the Mental Health and Motivation website (in the capacity as report requester) disclaim any liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions and will not be held responsible for any decisions or conclusions made based on this information."
Image Created: Chat GPT 2025