The Psychology of War Reveals the Deep Mental and Emotional Impacts that Conflict has on Individuals and Societies
Abstract
"War exerts a profound psychological toll on those who experience it directly or indirectly. From soldiers on the battlefield to civilians caught in the crossfire, the psychological impact of war encompasses trauma, identity shifts, moral injury, and long-term mental health disorders. This report explores the psychological underpinnings and consequences of war, drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from psychology, neuroscience, sociology, and history. The report also addresses resilience, coping mechanisms, and the societal ramifications of war-induced psychological changes.
- Introduction
- Psychological Drivers of War
- Psychological Effects on Soldiers
- Psychological Effects on Civilians
- Psychological Mechanisms During War
- Resilience and Coping
- Societal and Policy Implications
- Conclusion
- References
- Report Compiler
- Disclaimer
1. Introduction
War has long been a part of human history, shaping nations, ideologies, and collective memory. While much attention is given to the political and economic consequences of war, its psychological dimensions are equally critical. The psychology of war refers to the study of mental and emotional responses to warfare, as well as the psychological factors that drive individuals and groups toward conflict. This report investigates how war affects mental health, with a particular focus on soldiers and civilians. It also examines how psychological principles such as dehumanization, moral disengagement, and identity formation play roles in both the conduct of war and its aftermath.
2. Psychological Drivers of War
- Group Identity and In-Group Bias
One of the most powerful psychological motivators of war is the formation of group identities and the corresponding biases toward out-groups. Social identity theory posits that individuals derive part of their self-concept from the groups to which they belong (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). In times of conflict, national, ethnic, or religious identities can be heightened, fostering an "us versus them" mentality. This polarization can justify violence against out-groups and perpetuate cycles of aggression.
- Dehumanization
Dehumanization is a psychological process wherein opponents are seen as less than human, making violence against them more palatable. Haslam (2006) describes two forms: animalistic dehumanization, where others are likened to animals, and mechanistic dehumanization, where they are seen as robotic or soulless. Soldiers and propagandists often engage in dehumanizing language to reduce empathy and moral conflict.
- Moral Disengagement
Moral disengagement, as described by Bandura (1999), allows individuals to commit acts they would normally consider immoral by justifying them within a wartime context. Mechanisms include displacement of responsibility, euphemistic labeling (e.g., “collateral damage”), and diffusion of responsibility among group members. These psychological defenses enable participation in violence while preserving a sense of moral integrity.
3. Psychological Effects on Soldiers
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Perhaps the most widely recognized psychological consequence of war on soldiers is PTSD. Defined by intrusive memories, hyperarousal, avoidance behaviors, and negative alterations in cognition and mood, PTSD is prevalent among combat veterans. Research indicates that between 10% and 30% of veterans experience PTSD, with variations depending on the intensity of combat and support systems post-deployment (American Psychiatric Association, 2022).
- Moral Injury
Moral injury refers to the psychological distress resulting from actions—or the failure to act—that violate an individual’s moral or ethical code. Unlike PTSD, which is fear-based, moral injury is rooted in guilt, shame, and betrayal (Litz et al., 2009). For example, a soldier who kills a civilian by accident may struggle with moral injury even if their action was legally justified.
- Depression and Anxiety
Apart from PTSD, soldiers often experience depression, generalized anxiety, and substance use disorders. Hoge et al. (2004) found that 15.6% to 17.1% of soldiers returning from Iraq met criteria for major depression or generalized anxiety disorder. The transition from combat zones to civilian life can exacerbate these issues, particularly when social reintegration is lacking.
- Identity Disruption and Isolation
War also disrupts identity and belonging. Many veterans report a loss of purpose and identity upon returning home. The warrior identity formed in combat may clash with civilian roles, leading to isolation, resentment, or nostalgia for the camaraderie of wartime (Hall, 2011).
4. Psychological Effects on Civilians
- Trauma and Displacement
Civilians in war zones face intense psychological trauma from witnessing violence, losing loved ones, or being forcibly displaced. Internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees often experience acute stress reactions and prolonged grief. According to Fazel et al. (2005), refugees are ten times more likely to suffer from PTSD and twice as likely to develop depression compared to the general population.
- Intergenerational Trauma
The psychological scars of war can extend beyond those directly affected, influencing subsequent generations. Intergenerational trauma, first studied in Holocaust survivors’ descendants, suggests that children of war survivors may inherit psychological distress through learned behaviors, family dynamics, or even epigenetic changes (Yehuda et al., 2016).
- Desensitization and Violence Normalization
Prolonged exposure to violence can desensitize civilians, particularly children. In war-torn societies, aggression may become normalized, undermining social trust and civic cooperation. Studies in conflict zones like Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of the Congo reveal that children exposed to war violence show higher aggression and lower empathy in adulthood (Betancourt et al., 2010).
- Loss of Cultural Identity and Community
War often leads to the destruction of cultural sites, languages, and communal bonds. These losses contribute to collective grief and identity fragmentation. For indigenous or minority populations, the psychological effects are compounded by the erasure of heritage and support structures (Kirmayer et al., 2011).
5. Psychological Mechanisms During War
- Obedience and Authority
Milgram’s (1963) obedience experiments demonstrated that ordinary people could commit harmful acts when instructed by an authority figure. This principle explains why soldiers may follow orders to commit atrocities, even when such actions conflict with their personal morals. Hierarchical military structures and social conditioning amplify this effect.
- Cognitive Dissonance
Soldiers and civilians alike may experience cognitive dissonance when their actions or beliefs during wartime conflict with their moral values. This mental discomfort can lead to attitude change, moral justification, or psychological distress. Festinger's (1957) theory helps explain why individuals might rationalize war-related behaviors.
- Emotional Numbing and Dissociation
To cope with extreme stress, individuals may engage in emotional numbing or dissociation—a psychological detachment from one’s surroundings or emotions. While protective in the short term, chronic dissociation can impair functioning and interpersonal relationships over time (American Psychiatric Association, 2022).
6. Resilience and Coping
- Protective Factors for Soldiers
Social support, unit cohesion, and purpose-driven missions are major protective factors for soldiers. Veterans who maintain strong social networks are less likely to develop PTSD or depression (Pietrzak et al., 2009). Training in mindfulness, emotion regulation, and meaning-making has also shown promise in reducing the psychological toll of combat.
Protective Factors for Civilians
For civilians, resilience is bolstered by community solidarity, religious or cultural frameworks, and access to mental health services. Programs that provide trauma-informed care, psychoeducation, and economic support can mitigate long-term psychological damage (Tol et al., 2013).
- Post-Traumatic Growth
Some individuals experience positive psychological change following adversity—a phenomenon known as post-traumatic growth (PTG). PTG may manifest as a greater appreciation for life, deeper relationships, or spiritual development (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). Both soldiers and civilians can experience PTG, particularly when supported by reflective practices and therapy.
7. Societal and Policy Implications
- Reintegration and Veteran Care
Governments must prioritize comprehensive care for returning soldiers, including access to mental health services, employment opportunities, and social reintegration programs. Untreated psychological injuries can contribute to homelessness, substance abuse, and even violence (Tsai & Rosenheck, 2015).
- Civilian Rehabilitation
Civilians recovering from war require psychological first aid, long-term trauma support, and avenues for rebuilding community identity. Schools, healthcare systems, and local leadership play vital roles in this recovery. International organizations must fund and facilitate culturally sensitive mental health interventions in post-conflict zones (WHO, 2022).
- Prevention Through Education and Diplomacy
Understanding the psychological mechanisms of war can aid in conflict prevention. Peace education, intergroup dialogue, and empathy training can reduce in-group bias and foster reconciliation. Policies should aim to address the root causes of war—poverty, inequality, and political oppression—through peaceful means.
8. Conclusion
The psychology of war reveals the deep mental and emotional impacts that conflict has on individuals and societies. Soldiers endure moral dilemmas, trauma, and identity shifts, while civilians suffer from displacement, violence, and long-lasting grief. Psychological mechanisms like dehumanization, moral disengagement, and obedience to authority facilitate war’s horrors but also offer insight into how to prevent and heal from them. Promoting resilience, providing psychological care, and fostering cross-cultural understanding are essential to mitigating the damage and building a more peaceful future." (Source: ChatGPT 2025)
9. References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR).
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Betancourt, T. S., Borisova, I. I., Williams, T. P., et al. (2010). Sierra Leone’s former child soldiers: A follow-up study of psychosocial adjustment and community reintegration. Child Development, 81(4), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01455.x
Fazel, M., Wheeler, J., & Danesh, J. (2005). Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: A systematic review. The Lancet, 365(9467), 1309–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Hall, L. K. (2011). The importance of understanding military culture. Social Work in Health Care, 50(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2010.513914
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
Hoge, C. W., Castro, C. A., Messer, S. C., et al. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040603
Kirmayer, L. J., Gone, J. P., & Moses, J. (2011). Rethinking historical trauma. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461514536358
Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., et al. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Pietrzak, R. H., Johnson, D. C., Goldstein, M. B., et al. (2009). Perceived stigma and barriers to mental health care utilization among OEF–OIF veterans. Psychiatric Services, 60(8), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1118
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
Tol, W. A., Barbui, C., Galappatti, A., et al. (2013). Mental health and psychosocial support in humanitarian settings. The Lancet, 378(9802), 2124–2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61094-5
Tsai, J., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2015). Risk factors for homelessness among US veterans. Epidemiologic Reviews, 37(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxu004
World Health Organization. (2022). Mental health in emergencies. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-in-emergencies
Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Desarnaud, F., et al. (2016). Epigenetic biomarkers as predictors and correlates of symptom improvement following psychotherapy in combat veterans with PTSD. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00195
This ' The Psychology of War' report is based on information available at the time of its preparation and is provided for informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and completeness, errors and omissions may occur. The compiler of the The Psychology of War report (ChatGPT) and / or Vernon Chalmers for the Mental Health and Motivation website (in the capacity as report requester) disclaim any liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions and will not be held responsible for any decisions or conclusions made based on this information."
Image: Created by ChatGPT 2025